Kate Bahen from Charity Intelligence
Kate Bahen is a self-appointed watchdog of the charitable sector in Canada, despite having no credentials for this role. Kate Bahen, and her colleague Greg Thomson, have regularly made false and misleading statements about charities in Canada in their desire to receive media coverage. Despite employing only three full-time staff, none of whom are CPAs, Charity Intelligence issues annual ratings of charities, including giving them a grade on their financial transparency. Between 2014 and 2020, Charity Intelligence had consistently given WE Charity an overall grade of “A”, and did so as recently as 6 months before the CSSG was announced in June 2020. Soon after the CSSG controversy began, the rating was quickly downgraded. Charity Intelligence used the media coverage during this period to increase her notoriety and raise money for her own organization, having four times the cash reserves on hand following the attacks on WE Charity.
During this time, Kate Bahen was regularly in line with Conservatives in their talking points attacking WE Charity in Canada. She failed to disclose that she was a regular donor to the Conservative Party of Canada and her Board Chair Graeme Hepburn has donated over $44,000 to the Conservative Party as well as hosting fundraisers for Conservative leaders at his home. Graeme Hepburn’s wife, Claudia, has also donated $24,000 to the Conservative Party and is the former Director of right-wing think tank Fraser Institute.
Kate Bahen is not a Certified Public Accountant and has no evident professional training in accounting that would qualify her to make such assertions and conclusions. Her assessments were directly refuted and proven false by multiple lawyers, tax experts and forensic auditors. Kate Bahen also has a history of making false and inflammatory comments about charities. In May 2019, she was forced to formally apologize for false and misleading statements she made about the True North Foundation – the charitable arm of the Winnipeg Jets hockey team.
Kate Bahen from Charity Intelligence uses questionable tactics while operating a non-profit
What you should know
If Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had simply recused himself from involvement during the cabinet vote for the program, the entire WE Charity “scandal” would have been avoided. Justin Trudeau later apologized for not recusing himself. Nine months later, Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion cleared Justin Trudeau of any wrongdoing, but it was too little too late. It is not WE Charity's responsibility to manage the Government of Canada's perceived conflicts of interest.
See original mediaJustin Trudeau's comment that WE Charity was “the only organization in Canada” capable of delivering the program harmed, rather than helped, the situation from WE’s perspective. His statement shifted the spotlight from the government procurement process—which opposition politicians and the media had every right to scrutinize—to the charity. Justin Trudeau only appeared for ninety minutes of questioning before leaving for a vacation. Conversely, WE Charity representatives spent over 9 hours answering questions from Members of Parliament.
See original mediaEven though he formerly served as Minister of Youth, Justin Trudeau did not protect Canada’s largest youth organization, taking no personal responsibility for the organization’s downfall and showing no moral courage to speak up. He left tens of thousands of students without summer income thanks to his mishandling of the CSSG. Although he promised an alternative solution once WE Charity proactively removed itself from the program, he broke that promise as well, letting students down because it was more politically convenient to do so.
See original mediaCharlie Angus in the Press
The NDP’s Charlie Angus and The Decline of Canadian Politics.
Article by The Seeker
People Like Charlie Angus Are Part of the Problem of Toxic Politics. Not the Solution.
Article by Fair Press
Farewell, Charlie Angus. We’ll Clean Up the Damage You Caused.
Article by Fair Press