Pierre Poilievre, MP
Opposition Member of Parliament
It’s no surprise that Conservative attack dog Pierre Poilievre was front and centre in trying to attack WE Charity and the Kielburgers in a proxy attack against his real target, Justin Trudeau.
It was clear that Pierre Poilievre’s playbook was along the lines of ‘the more you can smear WE Charity, the worse it will look for Justin Trudeau.’ And smear he did. But he did so knowing he had full legal immunity for anything he said in the House of Commons or Parliamentary Committees because of the power given to him by Parliamentary Privilege, a form of legal immunity that protects members of Parliament and Senators from being sued for what they say in the House or during Committee meetings.
During committee meetings, Pierre Poilievre acted like a schoolyard bully to witnesses, attacking and insulting them, interrupting and repeatedly threatening them. At one point the Chair of the committee warned he would shut down hearings if Pierre Poilievre continued his antics and personal attacks.
Pierre Poilievre worked closely with Charlie Angus as lead critics from the Right and Left, with Poilievre becoming the official leader of the opposition shortly thereafter. Neither Charlie Angus nor Pierre Poilievre would have been able to get away with their attacks without the veil of Parliamentary Privilege providing them legal immunity from false statements.
Kate Bahen from Charity Intelligence uses questionable tactics while operating a non-profit
What you should know
If Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had simply recused himself from involvement during the cabinet vote for the program, the entire WE Charity “scandal” would have been avoided. Justin Trudeau later apologized for not recusing himself. Nine months later, Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion cleared Justin Trudeau of any wrongdoing, but it was too little too late. It is not WE Charity's responsibility to manage the Government of Canada's perceived conflicts of interest.
See original mediaJustin Trudeau's comment that WE Charity was “the only organization in Canada” capable of delivering the program harmed, rather than helped, the situation from WE’s perspective. His statement shifted the spotlight from the government procurement process—which opposition politicians and the media had every right to scrutinize—to the charity. Justin Trudeau only appeared for ninety minutes of questioning before leaving for a vacation. Conversely, WE Charity representatives spent over 9 hours answering questions from Members of Parliament.
See original mediaEven though he formerly served as Minister of Youth, Justin Trudeau did not protect Canada’s largest youth organization, taking no personal responsibility for the organization’s downfall and showing no moral courage to speak up. He left tens of thousands of students without summer income thanks to his mishandling of the CSSG. Although he promised an alternative solution once WE Charity proactively removed itself from the program, he broke that promise as well, letting students down because it was more politically convenient to do so.
See original mediaCharlie Angus in the Press
The NDP’s Charlie Angus and The Decline of Canadian Politics.
Article by The Seeker
People Like Charlie Angus Are Part of the Problem of Toxic Politics. Not the Solution.
Article by Fair Press
Farewell, Charlie Angus. We’ll Clean Up the Damage You Caused.
Article by Fair Press